Materials and façade
The building is clad entirely in precast concrete panels — factory-made concrete sections that were transported to the site and assembled. This construction method allowed for:
- Precise fabrication and quality control
- Consistent modular units across the entire façade
- Rapid on-site assembly
- A monolithic appearance despite modular construction
- Reduced on-site concrete work
The concrete panels were designed to provide sun protection and visual depth through their articulation — each panel has a deep reveal that creates strong shadow lines across the façade.
The windows are dark tinted glass set in aluminum frames. The glass is deliberately dark, receding visually so that the concrete structure dominates the façade. This creates a strong contrast between solid (concrete) and void (glass), with the solid clearly dominant — a characteristic of Brutalist architecture.
The façade is organized in a strict modular grid:
- 36 bays along the building's length
- 13 bays along the sides
- Consistent rhythm of concrete panels and windows across all faces
At the base, where the building meets the ground, thick concrete columns are visible — making the structural system legible and emphasizing the weight being transferred to the foundation.
The building has a flat roof — another modernist characteristic, rejecting traditional pitched roofs in favor of pure geometric form.
The design process and Mayor Lee's vision
The Armstrong building exists because of the architectural ambitions of New Haven's mayor, Richard C. Lee, who served from 1954 to 1970 and pursued an aggressive urban renewal program aimed at transforming New Haven into a model of modern American urbanism.
When Armstrong Rubber Company approached Lee in 1966 about building their headquarters in New Haven, Lee saw an opportunity. He agreed to facilitate the land acquisition — a prominent site visible from two interstate highways — on the condition that Armstrong hire a "world-renowned architect."
Armstrong initially proposed a conventional low-rise building. Lee pushed back, suggesting a building of eight to ten stories that would serve as an architectural landmark visible from the highways, announcing New Haven's architectural sophistication to passing motorists.
Breuer responded to this challenge with a design that went far beyond a simple tall building. Rather than creating a conventional office tower, he proposed the suspended structure — turning a functional requirement (acoustic isolation) into a dramatic architectural statement.
The design process involved close collaboration between:
- Marcel Breuer and Robert F. Gatje (architects)
- Armstrong's management (who needed to approve the unconventional design)
- Mayor Lee's administration (who wanted architectural significance)
- Structural engineers (who had to solve the unprecedented suspended floor system)
The result satisfied everyone: Armstrong got a building that functioned perfectly for their needs, Breuer got to realize one of his most dramatic structural concepts, and Mayor Lee got the landmark he wanted.
Armstrong's brief occupancy (1970–1988)
Armstrong Rubber Company occupied the building for only 18 years — a surprisingly short period given the building's custom design for their specific needs.
The building functioned exactly as intended during this period:
- R&D labs on the ground and first floors developed new tire compounds and tested products
- Administrative offices occupied the suspended floors above
- The acoustic separation worked perfectly — office workers reported the building was remarkably quiet despite heavy industrial equipment operating two stories below
- The building's prominent location on Interstate 95 gave Armstrong high visibility
However, by the mid-1980s, Armstrong was struggling financially. The American tire industry faced intense competition from foreign manufacturers, and Armstrong was losing market share. In 1988, the Italian tire manufacturer Pirelli purchased Armstrong Rubber Company, acquiring all its assets including the New Haven building.
Pirelli ownership and the "Pirelli Tire Building" (1988–1999)
When Pirelli purchased Armstrong in 1988, the building was renamed the Pirelli Tire Building — the name by which it's still most commonly known, despite this representing only 11 years of its 50+ year history.
Pirelli initially continued using the building for offices and some limited R&D functions, but the company's main North American operations were elsewhere. The building never fully functioned as Pirelli's headquarters in the way it had for Armstrong.
By the mid-1990s, Pirelli had decided the building no longer served their needs. In June 1999, Pirelli sold the property to developers who announced ambitious plans to build a large shopping mall on the site, with Nordstrom as one of the anchor tenants.
The announcement immediately triggered alarm among preservation groups and architects, who recognized the building's architectural significance and feared demolition.
The vacant years (1999–2019): preservation battles
From May 1999 onward, the building stood largely vacant for over two decades — one of the longest periods of abandonment for a significant modernist building in America.
Preservation efforts (1999–2000)
When the threat of demolition became clear, city officials, preservationists, and the New Haven Arts Council's Alliance for Architecture mobilized to protect the building. Their efforts led to the building being listed on the Connecticut Register of Historic Places in 2000.
This listing provided some protection, but not enough to prevent demolition if a developer was determined. Multiple planning inquiries were held as various proposals came forward.
Vandalism and neglect (1999–2003)
The vacant building became a target. In 1999, a vandal broke into the building and stole just $50 worth of copper piping, but caused thousands of dollars in damage in the process.
Preservation groups criticized the building's owners for allowing demolition by neglect — the practice of deliberately allowing a building to deteriorate so that demolition becomes the only economically viable option.
Occasional exhibition uses (2002, 2017)
Despite its vacancy, the building occasionally saw temporary uses:
- In 2002, it hosted hundreds of artists as part of the annual "City-Wide Open Studios" event
- In 2017, New Haven-born visual artist Tom Burr utilized the entire first floor for a conceptual art exhibition titled Body/Building
These temporary uses demonstrated the building's potential for adaptive reuse, but no permanent solution materialised.
IKEA purchase and partial demolition (2003)
In 2003, the furniture retailer IKEA purchased the site to build an adjacent store. IKEA announced plans to demolish approximately 64,000 square feet of the building's low-rise R&D base and replace it with 150 parking spaces.
The Long Wharf Advocacy Group — a local coalition — strongly opposed the demolition, arguing for alternatives that would better preserve the structure. The Connecticut chapter of the American Institute of Architects also criticised the plan.
Despite this opposition, IKEA proceeded with demolition in April 2003, destroying most of the low-rise laboratory section while sparing only the portion directly beneath the suspended offices. Critics argued this demolition "disrupted the intended asymmetrical visual balance of the structure" — Breuer had designed the building as a composition of two distinct masses, and removing most of one mass fundamentally altered the architectural composition.
IKEA's store opened in July 2004. The company used the remaining building and its freestanding sign structure to hang massive billboard-like advertisements facing Interstate 95 — an ironic fate for a building designed by one of modernism's masters.
Failed attempts at reuse (2003–2019)
Mall company Westfield America had purchased the site in March 2001, but their plans for a large shopping mall never materialized. The project was abandoned by 2000, and Westfield retained ownership for years without developing the site.
IKEA owned the building from 2003 to 2019, but never found a viable use for it. The company received multiple offers over the years but rejected them, finding none sufficiently promising.
By 2018, the building had been vacant for nearly 20 years — a derelict Brutalist monument slowly deteriorating beside a busy IKEA parking lot.
Rescue and transformation: Hotel Marcel (2019–2022)
In December 2019, Connecticut architect and developer Becker + Becker purchased the 2.76-acre property from IKEA for $1.2 million — a remarkably low price reflecting the building's derelict condition and uncertain future.
Bruce Becker announced an audacious plan: convert the building into a net-zero energy boutique hotel and conference center — the first hotel in the United States to generate all its own energy, and the first Passive House-certified hotel in the country.
IKEA, which had rejected several previous offers, was sufficiently encouraged by Becker's preservation-minded approach and sustainability goals to sell at a price that made the project financially viable.
The renovation (2020–2022)
The renovation, designed by Becker + Becker with interior design by Brooklyn-based Dutch East Design, focused on:
Exterior preservation:
- New triple-glazed windows (replacing the original dark tinted single-pane glass)
- Power-washing the concrete façade to restore its original appearance
- Minimal exterior alterations, respecting Breuer's design
Interior transformation:
- Complete reconfiguration of the floor plates for hotel use
- 165 guest rooms distributed across the upper floors
- Ground floor: lobby, restaurant (BLDG), bar, event space
- Retention of some original features: granite floor tiles, wall tiles, original staircase, polished granite reception desk
Sustainability systems:
- Rooftop solar panels + parking lot solar canopy
- Total solar capacity: 700,000 kilowatt hours per year (enough to cover hotel's needs)
- All-electric systems (no fossil fuels): heating, cooling, laundry, kitchens
- Triple-glazed windows for thermal insulation
- Battery storage system
- 14 electric vehicle charging stations
- Electric 14-passenger shuttle
Guest rooms:
- Contrasting grays and walnut wood
- Cesca chairs designed by Marcel Breuer (bringing the architect's furniture into his building)
- Custom modular furniture by Dutch East Design
- Largest rooms on eighth floor (former executive suites) with kitchenettes and soaking tubs
- East-facing rooms: views over New Haven Harbor
- West-facing rooms: views over New Haven skyline
The project cost approximately $50 million (exact figure not publicly disclosed).
Opening (May 2022)
Hotel Marcel opened on May 16, 2022, operated by Hilton's Tapestry brand. The name honors the building's architect.
The hotel immediately received widespread attention as:
- The first Passive House-certified hotel in the United States
- The first net-zero energy hotel in the country
- A successful example of adaptive reuse of Brutalist architecture
- A vindication of preservation efforts that had lasted over 20 years
Reception and significance
The Financial Times included Hotel Marcel in its "Architecture to see in 2023," praising it as "a striking Brutalist landmark" and a successful renovation comparable to the transformation of Breuer's 945 Madison Avenue building (now serving the Frick Collection).
The project demonstrates that even buildings once dismissed as "ugliest in the state" can find new life when approached with creativity, commitment, and sustainable design principles.
Becker + Becker's project manager, Violette de La Selle, oversaw the complex transformation, balancing historic preservation requirements, hotel operational needs, and ambitious sustainability goals.
National Register listing (2021)
The building was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2021 (National Register #100006186), shortly before the hotel conversion was completed.
The listing recognizes:
- Architectural significance as a work by Marcel Breuer
- Innovative structural system (suspended floors from cantilevered trusses)
- Important example of Brutalist architecture
- Role in New Haven's modernist building program under Mayor Richard C. Lee
The listing includes not only the main building but also the freestanding three-story concrete sign structure at the northeast corner — originally built to hold Armstrong's corporate signage, later used by Pirelli and IKEA for advertisements.
Public perception: "ugliest building" to celebrated landmark
The Armstrong building has had one of the most polarized receptions of any American building.
Critical acclaim:
- Praised by architects and critics from its completion in 1970
- Connecticut AIA chapter consistently defended the building
- Preservation organization Docomomo (Documentation and Conservation of Buildings, Sites and Neighborhoods of the Modern Movement) listed it as a significant modernist building
- National Register listing in 2021
Public criticism:
- In 2018, Business Insider published a survey identifying the "ugliest building in every US state" — Connecticut residents chose the Pirelli/Armstrong building
- Local TV station WTNH covered the story, sparking debate
- The building's heavy concrete aesthetic, blank upper floor, and industrial character never gained popular affection
This tension reflects broader debates about Brutalist architecture:
- Architects appreciate bold structural expression, honest materials, and sculptural form
- General public often finds concrete buildings cold, forbidding, or ugly
The successful hotel conversion has begun shifting public perception — the building is now seen by many as a valuable landmark worth preserving, and the sustainability achievements have added a new layer of significance beyond pure architectural form.
Model-maker's lens
The Armstrong Rubber Company Building is architecture as engineering made visible — structure as sculpture, function as form.
- Focus — the side elevation, showing the suspended upper block floating above the base with the dramatic 17-foot void between them. This is the building's essential idea: two masses, one held impossibly aloft. The void must be legible — it's not merely a recessed floor but empty space.
- Detail — the rhythm of precast concrete panels creating a strict modular grid across the façade. The deep reveals of each panel creating shadow lines. The dark recessed windows. At model scale, we simplify individual panel joints but preserve the overall rhythm and the crucial relationship between solid and void.
- How it reads at small scale — extraordinarily well, because the architecture is fundamentally about massing and proportion rather than surface ornament. The suspended block, the void, the heavy base — all of these read clearly at any scale. Simplified, the building becomes even more powerful: two horizontal masses, one floating above the other, separated by emptiness.
- How to display — best viewed from the the front, where the cantilevers are fully visible and the structural drama is clearest. The building was designed to be seen from Interstate 95, viewed by passing motorists at speed, so it works well when the entire composition is visible at once. Directional lighting emphasises the depth of the void and the shadow lines of the precast panels. Natural or cool lighting suits the concrete's industrial character.
Modelling the Armstrong building is an exercise in understanding Brutalist monumentality and structural expression — how post-war modernists used concrete's mass and structural potential to create buildings that were simultaneously functional problem-solving and bold sculptural statements. The model captures Breuer's concept at the scale of an object you can hold: architecture as structure made visible, engineering as drama, concrete as the material that makes the impossible real.
The building's recent transformation into Hotel Marcel adds another layer to its story — demonstrating that even the most uncompromising modernist buildings can find new life when approached with creativity and commitment to sustainability. The model captures the building at the moment of its architectural conception — but carries forward a story of abandonment, rescue, and remarkable second life.
View the Armstrong Rubber Company Building architectural model
Frequently asked questions about the Armstrong Rubber Company Building
Who designed the Armstrong Rubber Company Building?
Marcel Breuer & Associates, with Robert F. Gatje as associate architect.
When was it built?
Designed 1967–68, constructed 1968–70, completed 1970.
Why is it called the Pirelli Tire Building?
Armstrong Rubber Company was purchased by Pirelli in 1988, and the building was renamed the Pirelli Tire Building. Pirelli owned it from 1988–1999. The building is now Hotel Marcel, but "Pirelli Tire Building" remains the most common name.
What is the suspended structure?
The building is divided into two parts: a two-story R&D base and a five-story administrative block suspended 17 feet above it, held aloft by seven 50-ton cantilevered steel trusses. The void between the two masses provides acoustic isolation and creates dramatic visual impact.
Why was it vacant for so long?
After Pirelli sold the building in 1999, it stood vacant for over 20 years due to unclear ownership, failed redevelopment plans, and the difficulty of finding a viable use for a large, architecturally uncompromising building.
What happened with IKEA?
IKEA purchased the site in 2003 and demolished approximately 64,000 square feet of the low-rise laboratory section to create parking for their adjacent store, which opened in 2004. IKEA owned the building until 2019 but never found a use for it.
What is Hotel Marcel?
The building was purchased by developer Becker + Becker in 2019 and converted into a 165-room hotel that opened in May 2022. It's the first Passive House-certified and first net-zero energy hotel in the United States.
What is net-zero energy?
The building generates all its own electricity through rooftop and parking lot solar panels (700,000 kWh annually), eliminating the need for fossil fuels.
Is the building listed?
Yes. Connecticut Register of Historic Places (2000) and National Register of Historic Places (2021).
Who was Robert F. Gatje?
Robert F. Gatje (1927–2018) was Marcel Breuer's closest collaborator from 1953 onward, serving as associate architect on most of Breuer's major projects including this building. His 2000 memoir Marcel Breuer: A Memoir provides detailed accounts of their work together.
Can I visit?
Yes. The building operates as Hotel Marcel (Hilton Tapestry Collection). The lobby, restaurant, and bar are accessible to the public. You can also stay in one of the guest rooms, many of which feature Cesca chairs designed by Marcel Breuer.
Related architectural themes
You may also be interested in:
Sources and further reading
- National Register of Historic Places — "Armstrong Rubber Company Building," National Register #100006186 (listed 2021), nomination form available at https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/DECD/Historic-Preservation/06_About_SHPO/State-Review-Board/sept-18-2020/Armstrong-Rubber-Co-Building-NR.pdf
- Wikipedia — "Hotel Marcel" at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotel_Marcel
- Architectural Record — "A Marcel Breuer Classic Is Reimagined as a Net Zero–Energy Hotel" (2022) at architecturalrecord.com
- Isabelle Hyman — Marcel Breuer, Architect: The Career and the Buildings (Harry N. Abrams, 2001) — comprehensive monograph, pages 268–269
- Robert Gatje — Marcel Breuer: A Memoir (Monacelli Press, 2000) — by Breuer's longtime associate
- Architectural Forum — July/August 1969, page 95, available at https://usmodernist.org/AF/AF-1969-07-08.pdf (original publication contemporary with construction)
- The New York Times — C.J. Hughes, "The View/From New Haven; As a Business Sets Up, A Group Takes Steps To Preserve a Landmark" (January 26, 2003) at nytimes.com
- CNN Travel — Adeline Chen, "This revived architectural landmark could be the first net-zero hotel in the US" at cnn.com/travel
- Financial Times — Edwin Heathcote, "Architecture to see in 2023" (December 28, 2022) at ft.com
- Vogue — "In New Haven, a Landmark Brutalist Building Becomes America's First Fossil Fuel-Free Hotel" (July 26, 2022) at vogue.com
- Hyperallergic — "Placing Pieces of Local History in an Empty Marcel Breuer Building" (August 10, 2017) at hyperallergic.com
- Business Insider — Leanna Garfield, "The ugliest building in every US state, according to people who live there" (2018) at businessinsider.com
- The Architect's Newspaper — "The retool of an aging Marcel Breuer showstopper takes the high road" (May 7, 2021) at archpaper.com
- Daily Nutmeg — "Checking It Out: Hotel Marcel" (August 11, 2022) at dailynutmeg.com
- New Haven Register — multiple articles 1999–2022 documenting the building's history, vacancy, and hotel conversion (archives available via NewsBank)
- Hotel Marcel official website — hotelmarcel.com (includes history and sustainability information)